Kurdish politicians trial resumed amid protests
Kurdish politicians trial resumed amid protests
The trial denominated Kurdistan Democratic Confederation (KCK) resumed today in Diyarbakýr.
More than 150 Kurdish politicians and human rights activists are accused of allegedly representing the urban wing of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). The biggest trial opened in Diyarbakir last October.
The Kurdish defendants at the Diyarbakýr 6th Heavy Criminal Court presented a petition to the Court Board to announce that, the court’s authority is not legitimate since there is no human rights standard regarding international agreements and principles.
The petition made the following points: The judicial system considered itself as a guardian angel for the whole system. When it comes to the Kurdish people and their demands, the problems and violations are getting heavier. This trial is part of the policy to politically eliminate Kurds. We are not the real subjects of this trial. The real subject of this trial are Kurdish people’s persistence on their demands to live free, equal and humanly. We cannot share these ideas at the court, since Kurdish is forbidden language. Ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) handcuffed us then court tied our tongue. We have our own language and we are going to speak it. Our language ‘Kurdish’ is not an unknown language as judges ordered to be written in the minutes.
The court board rejected the petition and adjourned the trail.
In a series of police operations beginning on 14 April 2009 and referred to in the press as the ‘KCK operations’, 151 people were detained on the basis of alleged links to illegal organizations. These people included lawyers, mayors, politicians, trade unionists, and human rights activists, and were recently brought to trial together in Diyarbakir, Turkey.
As the KCK is alleged to be the civil/political wing of the outlawed group and is, therefore, also an illegal organization. Members of the pro- Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) have been accused of being members of these illegal organizations. Only 15 days after the party’s significant gain in the March 2009 local elections, where it won 50 municipalities, mass raids were carried out at the homes, businesses and offices of mayors, party activists, human rights advisors, lawyers and many others, pursuant to the KCK operations.
The subsequent trial relating to the KCK operations began on 18 October 2010 at the Special State Penal Court. By the time the trial began many of the defendants had been in custody for a period of 18 months. Much of the evidence had apparently been gathered from wiretapping and phone bugging, and there was a lack of clarity regarding the exact charges, and the basis for such charges, against each defendant.
The trial is significant for the individual defendants, with each facing possible jail sentences of 15 years-to-life if found guilty. Further, the timing of the arrests has led many observers to question the state of democracy in Turkey. The number of defendants, their prolonged detention, the questionable means of collecting evidence, as well as the Court’s attitude towards the use of the Kurdish language in the trial, has fanned fears that the accusations are politically motivated rather than based on violations of the law. Therefore, the trial is of a wider significance in terms of the implications it raises regarding democracy in Turkey and the state’s attitude towards a political resolution of the Kurdish question.
More than 150 Kurdish politicians and human rights activists are accused of allegedly representing the urban wing of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). The biggest trial opened in Diyarbakir last October.
The Kurdish defendants at the Diyarbakýr 6th Heavy Criminal Court presented a petition to the Court Board to announce that, the court’s authority is not legitimate since there is no human rights standard regarding international agreements and principles.
The petition made the following points: The judicial system considered itself as a guardian angel for the whole system. When it comes to the Kurdish people and their demands, the problems and violations are getting heavier. This trial is part of the policy to politically eliminate Kurds. We are not the real subjects of this trial. The real subject of this trial are Kurdish people’s persistence on their demands to live free, equal and humanly. We cannot share these ideas at the court, since Kurdish is forbidden language. Ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) handcuffed us then court tied our tongue. We have our own language and we are going to speak it. Our language ‘Kurdish’ is not an unknown language as judges ordered to be written in the minutes.
The court board rejected the petition and adjourned the trail.
In a series of police operations beginning on 14 April 2009 and referred to in the press as the ‘KCK operations’, 151 people were detained on the basis of alleged links to illegal organizations. These people included lawyers, mayors, politicians, trade unionists, and human rights activists, and were recently brought to trial together in Diyarbakir, Turkey.
As the KCK is alleged to be the civil/political wing of the outlawed group and is, therefore, also an illegal organization. Members of the pro- Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) have been accused of being members of these illegal organizations. Only 15 days after the party’s significant gain in the March 2009 local elections, where it won 50 municipalities, mass raids were carried out at the homes, businesses and offices of mayors, party activists, human rights advisors, lawyers and many others, pursuant to the KCK operations.
The subsequent trial relating to the KCK operations began on 18 October 2010 at the Special State Penal Court. By the time the trial began many of the defendants had been in custody for a period of 18 months. Much of the evidence had apparently been gathered from wiretapping and phone bugging, and there was a lack of clarity regarding the exact charges, and the basis for such charges, against each defendant.
The trial is significant for the individual defendants, with each facing possible jail sentences of 15 years-to-life if found guilty. Further, the timing of the arrests has led many observers to question the state of democracy in Turkey. The number of defendants, their prolonged detention, the questionable means of collecting evidence, as well as the Court’s attitude towards the use of the Kurdish language in the trial, has fanned fears that the accusations are politically motivated rather than based on violations of the law. Therefore, the trial is of a wider significance in terms of the implications it raises regarding democracy in Turkey and the state’s attitude towards a political resolution of the Kurdish question.
